A more concise language is more efficient for an LLM to produce and easier for a... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		EricRiese 59 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Lobster Programming Language A more concise language is more efficient for an LLM to produce and easier for a human to verify. I don't think LLMs have solved the problem of wanting code that's concise and also performant.

CuriouslyC 59 days ago [–]

But a less concise language is (theoretically, if you're doing useful stuff with the verbosity) easier for machines to verify.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact