Why does a person have to be "for" something? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		rationalist 65 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracki... Why does a person have to be "for" something?

Psillisp 65 days ago [3 more]

[flagged]

Volundr 65 days ago | | [–]

The statement was made to point out that this is an example where a phone number is enough metadata to to problematic for privacy. It stands on its own. It doesn't need more context or purpose.

rationalist 65 days ago | | [–]

"sleaze"?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact