Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For a layperson, this is an accessible and directionally correct definition.

For the HN audience, of course this is 'technically incorrect'.

The article was written for the (larger) general public.

I am also glad they didn't squeeze in a word salad of LLMs and quantum technology and instead stuck to 'it's just standard ML'.



The only informational dividable from the statement is "we used a computer to analyze data".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: