No, I am saying that because they would not know who you are, they could not bring a civil case, and law enforcement would not get involved because it is not a criminal case since it is not illegal.
But if it was public, they would know who you are and could bring a civil case and go through the justice system.
> This is way oversimplified. Delivering a "shoddy product" is not illegal and it's not the responsibility of victims to deliver justice, it's the responsibility of the government. If a victim wants justice they should go to a court and a court will have access to information on who owns a business.
Not necessarily.
And in a civil case, it is unfortunately the responsibility of the victim to set the wheels of justice in motion through the justice system.
I have no idea why you think I am in favor of mob justice when I am at risk of it too as an LLC owner.
> No they do not. Not everything is a right because of feelings.
This is what the commenter above meant with "rights for me and not for thee." You want privacy, but you deny your customers the right of knowing who they are doing business with.
But if it was public, they would know who you are and could bring a civil case and go through the justice system.
> This is way oversimplified. Delivering a "shoddy product" is not illegal and it's not the responsibility of victims to deliver justice, it's the responsibility of the government. If a victim wants justice they should go to a court and a court will have access to information on who owns a business.
Not necessarily.
And in a civil case, it is unfortunately the responsibility of the victim to set the wheels of justice in motion through the justice system.
I have no idea why you think I am in favor of mob justice when I am at risk of it too as an LLC owner.
> No they do not. Not everything is a right because of feelings.
This is what the commenter above meant with "rights for me and not for thee." You want privacy, but you deny your customers the right of knowing who they are doing business with.