Hindenburg is not the real deal. If you think Hindenburg is the real deal you should pay closer attention to their activities. They (he) are one of a number of noisy short sellers who try to drive stock prices with their tweets/reports. SEC should be doing things to these people.
That said, he is probably right about Tether. Tether should make every crypto speculator or holder very nervous.
> Hindenburg is not the real deal. If you think Hindenburg is the real deal you should pay closer attention to their activities. They (he) are one of a number of noisy short sellers who try to drive stock prices with their tweets/reports. SEC should be doing things to these people.
Yes, he has a website where he pats himself on the back for all of the good calls he's made. I've seen it. Ask yourself, why does a short seller need public confidence at all? It's because they want to be able to move the stock price when they publish something.
> Yes, he has a website where he pats himself on the back for all of the good calls he's made. I've seen it. Ask yourself, why does a short seller need public confidence at all? It's because they want to be able to move the stock price when they publish something.
I'm sorry, but no shit? You frame it like there's some insight or conspiracy theory in there.
Again: What is your issue with this? The market has rules, some companies skirt them or outright lie. The size of the market is too large to regulate with our current mechanisms and short sellers fill some of these gaps for a profit. It becomes an issue if the short seller is wrong and causes harm to a company undeservingly, but you haven't proven that case here.
> It's because they want to be able to move the stock price when they publish something.
Publicity helps move the market which is how they make money. Why do you think that make [him|them] illegitimate? You've not explained this part. It seems to me that you've got an axe to grind with short sellers in general. Hindenburg seems to clearly be "the real deal", whether or not you approve of what "the real deal" is.
This argument has been done to death. I personally find the conga line of analysts and hedge fund managers who appear on CNBC and talk up their book of shit picks a lot worse than the best short selling shops.
There are so many bad companies that are public today, they really need somebody nipping at their heels.
The thing is, anybody that actually followed that industry in any serious way and had any technical understanding knew that that company was full of shit.
A number of stories were already floating around from former employees.
The company was the most obvious scam I have seen in my life. With minimal intelligence and just 10 min of listening to the CEO made clear that it was a scam company.
Sure they went threw the effort and and gathered that stuff up and did some research, but it was hardly some master-journalism that was required.
That may be, but the report had a striking effect.
This is a thread about Tether, another company that is an obvious scam, that even once admitted in court a few years back that they were only 74% backed.
If Hindenburg makes a report formalizing everything and getting some new research, that might well have a similar effect.
Do you have an example of them targeting a non-fraudulent/fair-valued company and ruining them?
As far as I know they were the ones who broke the NKLA scandal. We need short sellers to keep markets honest and stop fraudsters from taking advantage of the current exuberant markets.
Anybody that has been following that space in any details already knew that Nikola and Lordstown were terrible companies.
They did some minimal journalism on them and put it out. And nothing the showed outside of maybe that the truck was going down hill was in the least surprising.
you don't need to be a faithful believer - evidence speaks for itself. If hindenburg presents a short thesis, they would need to provide evidence in their papers.
No one should be blindly believing them, just because they have a good past record.
Short selling profit depends on timing - i.e. the drop happening before the fees for shorting kill you.
So I do have this information, and want to make $$$$$$$ it's actually in my interest to also collect $1M from Hindenburg, to make this information plabic, *after I've established my positions
Oh? Why should the SEC do anything? If it's wrong to talk about a company in hopes of affecting the stock price, shouldn't Elon Musk be doing hard time?
> "The US Securities Exchange Act defines market manipulation as "transactions which create an artificial price or maintain an artificial price for a tradable security"."
They are 'manipulating the market' in an informal sense, but not in the sense that actually matters. There is nothing wrong with publicly stating that you think some stock is overvalued. Particularly not if you back up your claim with some evidence, which is what Hindenburg does.
Relatedly, how does a 17 day old account, with no submissions, attract 416 karma points? Not commenting on the quality of your writing, but it seems extraordinary. Unfortunately the market history on HN is private.
As speedybird points out, that's not market manipulation in the legal sense. And if it were, the Fortune 500 CEOs and CFOs should go to jail immediately, because they all have whole departments that release information to analysts and the public in ways intended to influence the stock price.
If that's what you're arguing for, I might be able to get behind it. But I'm definitely opposed to "pumping the market is fine but countering hype should be illegal".
This is like saying Z$ should make every fiat speculator or holder very nervous. Crypto is huge. You can be involved without coming anywhere near USDT.
Unless they are exposed to USDT, why would they fold? They are trading Crypto against USDT (as a token). If USDT folds, its their customers that are going to hold the bag. But many exchanges have USDC too (and maybe their own USD pair); so users should be aware.
Hindenburg is not the real deal. If you think Hindenburg is the real deal you should pay closer attention to their activities. They (he) are one of a number of noisy short sellers who try to drive stock prices with their tweets/reports. SEC should be doing things to these people.
That said, he is probably right about Tether. Tether should make every crypto speculator or holder very nervous.