Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"I always say that given enough time, we can secure anything and find a way to say yes to it and business-driven CISOs are of that mind"

It's really a pretty balanced interview. This is what she said. There was a second interview, but I'm a lot more incensed that this information is being suppressed than at any one thing she says. I want to be furious when she says things like

"If a CISO can come up with a list of controls that he/she is comfortable with, then by and large the evidence proves that those controls are working effectively and are going to satisfy the elements of any framework that you use."

but all this interview really can show is that she knows some jargon, and her mindset. And I think it's really (truly, not in a figurative sense but literally) criminal that this information is suppressed. This is the case study of an interview that reveals insights from the mind of a CISO before disaster strikes... I literally don't even care that she was a Music major, how can anyone justify taking this down?

It's not just potentially criminal, it's also unconscionable. This should be preserved for posterity, I want to tar and feather the company, but I want to hear more from Susan Mauldin about what went wrong at Equifax.

I don't just want this interview back online, I want there to be a follow-up to this interview! And if it takes a pardon from Trump to make that happen, let's start the conversation.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: