Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
JoeAltmaier
on Oct 4, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Crispr: Nobel prize for gene-editing technique at ...
I'm not sure proteins have to be 'found'. They can be invented. Then they are a lot more like a copyright and not a patent.
bane
on Oct 4, 2015
|
next
[–]
The fun question is, if somebody invents one, and it's found in nature later, is that sufficient prior art to invalidate the patent?
88e282102ae2e5b
on Oct 4, 2015
|
prev
[–]
You could then still have the distinction between synthetic proteins and natural ones, and only permit patents on the synthetic ones.
comrh
on Oct 4, 2015
|
parent
[–]
What if you make a synthetic protein and then find it in nature? What if you build bacteria to make the synthetic protein? The difference between synthetic and natural seems like it would be very murky.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: