EDIT: Found this... https://github.com/erpc-io/eRPC

It doesn't say so on the English wikipedia page, but in some areas known for violence and particularly extreme Chinese crackdowns, wearing a mask in public is banned.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7690864/haskell-style-ma...

I worked on a toy example for this before.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7690864/haskell-style-may...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9692630/implementing-hask...

Maybe chaining is just sequencing functions against results with bind.

Lifting is a general concept that is applicable to functors, applicatives, monads, etc.

--> signifies the result of the computation

    fmap (+1) [0, 1, 2] --> [1, 2, 3]
    map  (+1) [0, 1, 2] --> [1, 2, 3]
    fmap (+1) (Just 2)  --> Just 3

There's a little bit of regrettable redundancy in Haskell's typeclasses, fmap, liftA, and liftM (functor, applicative, monad) all the same thing.

But liftM, while relevant to monads, isn't >>=, which is bind. bind being what's relevant to Maybe chaining (just using >>= against Maybe values).

India win, Novartis lose

As far as it goes, the only contentious part of his comment is the last line - India win, Novartis lose.

Otherwise his description of how Indians tend to deal with drug costs is a succinct portrayal of the current reality.