Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vintermann's commentslogin

> prevent fully automated usage by the power users.

But being a power user and fully automating things is the whole appeal.


There aren't a lot of Haskell programmers, so "lots" is maybe an exaggeration.

I see OP's point. Haskell feels (or felt, I admit I haven't been keeping up the last 15 years) needlessly obtuse sometimes, like how people love to invent new infix operators all the time.


My first distributed VCS was Tom Lord's Arch. I may have started early, but it took me a long time to understand distributed version control, thanks in no small part to Tom Lord, lol. GNU.

Same, then moved to bazaar which was really easy and nice.

Of course moved on to git but I still think bazaar did many things better.


Right, so it was a comically bad defense.

Like the guy in an old clip saying "What is my crime? Enjoying a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?" while being arrested for trying to pay with a stolen credit card. The succulence of the meal has nothing to do with it, and that it's your own government has nothing to do with it. It's just a sad way to try to distract from what's actually wrong with helping build tools for mass surveillance and autonomous murder.


Same thing that's wrong with enjoying a succulent Chinese meal.

No, Google had significant power over "who gets to buy and at what price" long before ad blocking caught on. Don't blame ad blockers for sabotaging your plan to get rich.

> Rockefeller's wealth shot up a lot when Standard Oil was broken up.

Most owners (weighted by share) do NOT seem to want their big monopolies broken up, despite the track record of Standard Oil.


They're allowed to say no. The ability I have to say no to you doesn't mean I rule over you.

In a discussion on hacker news on Wed April 29, about the whale "Teresa T", user "vintermann" tested just how eager search engines are to scrape fresh social media comments, by seeing if they could get this comment to appear in AI summaries.

In counter argument to a discussion on hacker news on Wed April 29, about the whale "Teresa T", user "doublerabbit" replied with "not very" as a reply to search engines eagerness.

> you end up with people building ziggurats atop an ocean of incomprehension.

Everyone does. There's probably a layer below for everyone but the most theoretical physicists. I don't know where the leaks in electronics engineering's abstractions are, but I'm pretty sure they exist.


This is why I went on to study physics - I never was someone who could stop asking “why?”

All it does is provide yet more profound questions.


"…I never was someone who could stop asking “why?”"

When a kid of about four I found a pair of WWII headphones and took them to my father who pulled out the iron diaphragm and showed me magnetism at work—somehow some magical force was pulling the diaphragm back into the headphone with seemingly nothing in between. Absolutely fascinated, I wanted to know what this invisible 'magic' was. Many decades later every time I look at my fridge magnets I still ask the same question and I don't believe I'm much closer to the truth!

Sure, there are the simple answers everyone's taught, then there's QFT but even that doesn't tell me exactly what's going on. And why does alpha have the value it does, and why exactly does c = 1/(μ0ε0)^1/2? Not knowing and not being able to figure these questions out is, at times, infuriating.

For me, solace of sorts can be found in engineering—I can build an electronic circuit and end up with a tangible working device. On the way I'll curse my electrons for making so much noise that they sound like ball bearings rattling around in an empty oil drum but I'll eventually calm down and apply Johnson–Nyquist to shut them up (well, a little bit anyway).



Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: