You could borrow the output of the perl scripts from openssl.

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/aes/as...

Reminds me there are several studies showing a very high occurrence of alcohol use disorder following bariatric surgery. Depends on whether you look at lifetime risk or immediate risk, but the numbers are really high...20 to 30%.

Various theories, like addiction transfer from food to alcohol, that euphoric effects are so much more quickly felt, post surgical depression, etc. But nobody really seems to know for sure.

Compared to other drugs, alcohol is metabolically significant, like you can easily drink enough alcohol to affect your energy balance directly.

That said, my experience is that my weight swings about 3kg if I am using cannabis or not using cannabis but that's got something to do with how it changes my appetite.

Interesting! Does it also occur for other (similar) types of surgery?

Well, and Google's proxy read of "quality" might have flawed assumptions. A concise page where you get what you need and leave quickly might read as "high bounce rate".

One thing it leaves out. For bankruptcies that result in reorganization rather than liquidation, it offers the airline an "out" on its many labor contracts. And freedom to renegotiate that contract with a lot of leverage. Labor is the highest cost they have, other than fuel.

Was looking for this comment. I'd like to see this approach in the comparison...having the LLM build a playwright script and use it. I suspect it would beat time-to-market for the api, and be close-ish in elapsed time per transaction.

Harder to scale if it's doing a lot of them, I suppose.

It is cool, but the demo is flawed, right at the second field:

  What's the business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above (line 2)?

As far as I can tell, no way to skip this, leave it empty, not even "use a space". And that field would be empty for many or most.

Have you tried telling the LLM to just skip the field and move to the next one?

I tried with various: "Skip it", "None, leave blank", "Skip this field" and all worked for me, but if may very well be missing something very obvious?

That would have occured to me if it were free-form chat, but it's guided and telling me to input the value, not a chat response. Unable to try, third round hits the demo limit.

I was not able to reproduce it, so I made a small video, hopefully I better understand your problem once you've seen it: https://cdn.simplepdf.com/simple-pdf/assets/hn-reply-tyingq....

In the video I let the chat fill my name, then have it skip the second field (business), then fill LLC, it makes a mistake and I correct it

I'm curious what options that leaves for docker. I assume the pattern of building/running linux/amd64 containers on MacOS is pretty widespread.

Edit: "Apple says that it will continue to support older, unmaintained gaming titles with Rosetta along with software running Intel binaries in Linux VMs beyond macOS 27 . There could also be future security fixes." - https://www.macrumors.com/2026/02/16/macos-tahoe-26-4-rosett...

No Apple citation shown for that, though seems plausible.

See https://developer.apple.com/documentation/macos-release-note...

AFAIK all ways of running docker on MacOS rely on a amd64 virtual machine with Linux kernel in it.

docker --platform linux/arm64 depends on amd64 ?

True, though some old processors would be able to implement pretty impressive tricks. A Z80 with an 8 bit latch can bank switch 8MB of SRAM with 32KB chunks.

> Is this intended for some kind of professional purpose?

No. Retrocomputing. Fun. Learning.

I wonder if the daisy wheel printer market just ticked up on eBay.