Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | transcriptase's commentslogin

The UK public can still vote for governments that don’t demand backdoors into citizens’ private data. Instead, over the past century they’ve turned their country into an ineffectual nanny state of shrinking global relevance, while a fading aristocratic and old money class desperately cling to influence over a population that no longer cares about the old titles and prestige of having attended some ‘old boys’ boarding school nobody outside of GB has ever heard of.

It’s the distilled mediocrity of the statements. Never venturing beyond a 10% margin of what you would get if you sampled the opinions of 1,000 people who underwent jury selection by west coast liberals.

Reddit astroturfing firms and bot farms learned to buy/use “seasoned” accounts over a decade ago. I’d venture there have been countless bots just in a holding pattern harmlessly building up reputation and a human-like history of posts across different subs etc just to eventually be either activated or sold to someone else to “burn”

It used to be super common that when you spotted a bot post and clicked through to the user's history, you'd see very average, human-looking activity from years ago, followed by a long gap of inactivity, and then a flurry of obvious bot comments.

It's very obvious that these accounts were abandoned and then either bought from their original owners, or more likely bought from someone who compromised them, because of their history and karma.

And I would bet money that Reddit is well aware of this phenomenon, because not long after it became so common as to be impossible to ignore, they papered over it by allowing users to hide their history from public view. (AFAIK subreddit moderators can still see it, but typical users now have much less ability to see whether they're interacting with actual humans.)


That and locking down the API meant no more sites offering readily available visualizations of this type of thing

> allowing users to hide their history from public view

Yeah it's become my default assumption that any user who does this is either a bot or a bad-faith troll.


I recently spotted one unmistakable example of this[0]. It’s been a trick for many years now that duplicating a human post and its comments is a good way to appear human but this was quite the example.

0: https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/w/Blog/2026-01-06/Is_The_Inter...


> duplicating a human post and its comments is a good way to appear human

Also just repeating something from the linked article, but often with different wording and in a tone that makes it seem like it was something that the article missed.


So what is the comment frequency of these bots? There must be some signal in the activity even if the comments themselves pass the turing test.

Even if there was, I doubt Reddit cares enough to go after them when it’s boosting their valuation

If you find one account you can find a few dozen spam accounts by building a graph of what posts they reply to

Most of them have private profiles these days

There are alternate sources that index reddit comments, but it's really frustrating how easy it would be for Reddit to shut the most prolific bots down if they were so inclined

Does it matter? With enough you can just have them upvote each other.

25,000 are bots farming drops

Next time give it the context required for the task, eg an explanation of why you have those hand coded simplifications, and be amazed at how proper use of a tool works better than just assuming your drill knows what size bit to pick.

I’ll take 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 over the bastard child of a mac address and bitlocker recovery key any day of the week.


Sure, but remember your prefix 187.231.91.67.135.47.0.0/16


Not sure about what point you are making but that legit more readable than ipv6


I hearby propose an IPv6.1. The only change is the written form goes from:

2001:db8::ff00:42:8329

to

128.1.13.184..255.0.0.66.131.41

By doing this, I have changed IPv6 from the strange unwanted alien thing everyone hates, to the new wonder protocol that "just adds more dots" that everyone wants.

I await my FIFA Peace Prize.


>We believe that the user experience comes first

I’ll believe that when YouTube gives me the ability to block certain channels versus “not interested” and “don’t recommend channel” buttons that do absolutely nothing close to what I want.

Or a thousand other things, but that one in particular has been top of mind recently.


Let me permanently hide "shorts".


You can mostly do it with ublock origin filters. Here are mine, though they do more.

www.youtube.com###contents-container > .ytd-rich-shelf-renderer.style-scope

www.youtube.com###rich-shelf-header

www.youtube.com###content > .ytd-rich-section-renderer.style-scope

||www.youtube.com/shorts/$document

Alternatively on firefox you can use either the "unhook" extension (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-recom...) or "enhancer for youtube" (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/enhancer-for-...) extension (which has an option for this).


Or if they ever bring back the "ignore this domain" feature so we can ignore ai slop and copycat sites.

It's why I went to Kagi.


For the uninformed what’s the deal with scribd?


Scribd are quite annoying. The pitch was "the YouTube for documents" allowing stuff to be posted and shared but they tend to try and get subscription money off you to see anything unlike the likes of YouTube.


Scribd scrapes the web of all the .PDFs that it can find, then gates them behind a paywall and SEOs their way to the top of Google's rankings. That's it, that's all they do. They run a zero value tollbooth with other peoples' IP, taking advantage of users who don't have the search-fu to hunt down the documents themselves.

They should pretty much die in a grease fire.


I have no idea if it’s still true but it used to be the case that you had 3 choices with a Wordpress install and even a couple plugins:

1) Have a part time job updating it and plugins, making sure you weren’t introducing vulns at every step

2) Leave it as is and hope that no vulns are discovered for your particular version or plugin versions

3) Have things auto-update and pray that your plugins don't get sold or compromised and backdoor your site


4) Don't use a stack of plugins, if you must use any keep them as dumb as possible and stick to those with a longstanding reputation.

A basic instance, set to auto-update, installed on a shared webhost where OS/web server updates are someone else's problem is pretty foolproof. A VPS running a long-term distro set to auto update is almost as good.

---

That said I personally dropped Wordpress for static site generation years ago because I realized I didn't actually need any of the dynamic features and wasn't using the WYSIWYG editor. Now I write Markdown in to a file in a git repo and then trigger a regeneration whenever I update it.


Sure, that's possible, but so much of the value of Wordpress is in the plugins.


Indeed. The GSA with 10k employees is going to fall apart without the 40k unused winzip licences DOGE so cruelly took away from them in their senseless spree of madness.


That logic is very short term and while comical isn't close to reality.

I hope you live a long and prosper life so you can see the consequences of this presidential term fully unfold.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: