2.764 petabytes of HBM per 8i? So that's where all the RAM went.

288 TB/pod (1024 chips).

I'm working on my IPv9 proposal as we speak. It has an LLM validating the contents of every packet. Gotta stay ahead of the curve.

I've got a spec for ipv11. Why? Because it's one more than 10.

I've got a spec for IPv2. Because of advances in carrier grade NAT, we can reduce the address field from 32 bits to 16, making amazing savings somehow.

Can’t you just make ten… one larger?

They're referencing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven (and you're one of today's lucky 10000: https://xkcd.com/1053/).

I think they are also riffing off the spinal tap scene, where he says "can't you just make 10 louder?".

I was mainly doing that, and more-obliquely making use of math/CS dork jokes like "1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1".

I think that's what your comment parent is referencing as well

Looked like they missed that their parent post was already doing that. As another poster points out: wooosh!

Can’t you just make the first post say “whoosh”, and have that be the post?

Haha. But this post is one more :)

whoosh

Is it backwards compatible with Windows 95/98? Maybe change the name to IPv10 just in case.

I can't be the only one who thought this was a phone farm based on iPhones running Apple A16Z SoC (which doesn't exist btw, it's A12Z or A16)

There are at least two of us

open blogpost → ⌘ + F "pelican" → 0 results ???

This is big for long-horizon tasks

Verification is faster than generation, one forward pass for verification of multiple tokens vs a pass for every new token in generation

> $30/150 MTok Umm no thank you

Looks great! Is it possible to increase the resolution? Each hexagon cover too much area

The map uses the H3 tiling system, and the cells displayed are resolution 4. Sometimes for specific cases I look at higher resolutions. For example, I believe this map I did during the still-unexplained Dallas-Fort Worth major interference event of 2022 uses resolution 6: https://twitter.com/lemonodor/status/1582403839004508160

The caveats of that tweet still apply to higher resolutions: Specifically that you start to see the effects of individual aircraft, which can be harder to interpret.

You articulated it perfectly. I felt exactly what you're describing now while reading the comments to a post about mindfulness a couple of days ago, but I didn't know how to phrase it.

Thank you!