Ok, so we treat it as an act of war. Now what? Attack North Korea? Great, the entire city of Seoul gets shelled within five minutes of your attack and hundreds of thousands of innocent people die.
It's very easy to play with lives that aren't yours.
You would be surprised how many people naively think "Why doesn't my country just open a war on X country and this Y problem will be solved forever" in their head they think war is just a flurry of bombardments and the other side (not theirs) is just destroyed to rubble and their country will have only minimal losses
Never retaliating is a great way to get people to attack you. Of course escalating to all-out war provokes the same in response, but there does need to be a proportionate response, because it needs to be stupid to hurt us, not good business. t’s a significant failure of the US government when half the world freely loots US citizens and businesses.
Exactly. This is the "Declare fentanyl a WMD" of solutions to ransomware. Sounds kinda badass as long as you don't spend too long thinking about it but has no practical relevance to actual enforcement challenges.
It's a familiar example of the perennial "[THING] could be solved overnight if [PERSON_OR_GROUP] would just start taking [THING] seriously" trope.
I think you can see this one of two ways: you could also consider it a miracle that the qwen models are able to perform so well when being trained on inefficient wrapper code data.
Am I the only one who thinks that your stop hook is written extremely poorly? Not only that, but you're writing to the LLM like an abusive human. No wonder it wants to go home.
He's contributed to improving trust on this forum. And idk if you've ever gotten commercial samples before but he's right, the amount they give you is immaterial to hurting them and can be material to you.
Also, he said that he's somehow stumbled into somehow having a commercial bottling license. If him, why not us?
It's very easy to play with lives that aren't yours.
reply