Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | prh8's commentslogin

Having long ago built an app that does gamecasts for multiple sports, similar to what you get from ESPN, every sport is completely different. There's almost nothing that matches up, except for the very basic concept of a box score. Even play by play has enough differences to be vastly different

I never once built an app for gamecasts, any sport, but even I do realize that sports are different... Not sure what made you(s) believe I'm suggesting the exact same UI for all the sports.

My company has pushed engineering all-in for AI in the last few months

Our stock price has also gone down 70% in the last few months

Naturally, we're pivoting our platform to put AI front and center


These aren't related in the way you think they are. Stock price reacts quickly to broader market trends, but more slowly for company-specific trends where revenue is likely stable. The impact of AI in engineering work will take months to show up in the product, probably a year after that for customers and the market to take notice. An AI product is a different thing entirely.

Did they try and be an blockchain-first company when that was the rage? Making NFTs and whatnot. Is your CEO just a trend-follower?

The beatings will continue until moral improves

Don't you mean morale? Businesses are basically amoral by desi....ooooooooh. I see what you did there.

What about the dictatorial regime that's bombing schools, falsely imprisoned tens of thousands, murdered far more than 100s, openly admitting to international war crimes?


Please don't perpetuate flamewars on HN. The GP comment was bad*, but responding in kind is the opposite of what we're trying for here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

(* for reasons—I hasten to add—unrelated to which side of the conflict they or anyone else is identifying with)


It's almost funny how both of these descriptions can apply to either country.


[flagged]


I agree that HN often turns a blind eye to all of the awful things that the US and Israel do, but Iran is hitting civilian targets as well.


Israel/the US started the war by murdering 160 Iranian school girls and has been murdering civilians non-stop since (and before) then. How many civilians has Iran killed?


Iran hit a teaching hospital so I guess they technically managed to hit a school and a hospital at the same time.


Iran has helped Russia bomb many schools and hospitals.


It's ironic how they've been so instrumental in bombing Ukraine's civilian targets (for years) and now they're likely to get their civilian infrastructure bombed, by a third party. Strange times.


You probably have to wait 2 more years to see if they're really a dictatorship, for the time being at least they still have an electoral mandate.


Having an electoral mandate is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. If you don't follow your own laws and your own constitution, for instance, you're not a in a democracy, even if you have been elected. Precisely because you are elected under the assumption that you will follow the laws and constitution, not have unlimited power to do whatever you like until the next elections.


The Trump regime is still borderline, but I think it's fair to call Netanyahu a dictator at this point.


Not to mention atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; 170,000+ deaths.


the japanese killed around 50 times that number of people in ww2 (R.J. Rummel, Statistics of Democide, 1997)


Who exactly are you talking about?


https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/26/ai-got-the-blam...

> On the first morning of Operation Epic Fury, 28 February 2026, American forces struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, in southern Iran, hitting the building at least two times during the morning session. American forces killed between 175 and 180 people, most of them girls between the ages of seven and 12


This doesn’t make the us or Israel a dictatorship


For readers not in Washington, there is currently legislation being worked on that is essentially a millionaire's tax, (simplified as) 10% income tax on income over 1 million dollars, inflation adjusted.

There are a few very angry, emotional, and vocal opponents of this in most corners of the internet, although very few of them actually make a million dollars and there are many million+ income people supporting this.

Demographically, there are over 3 million households in WA, and only 20k of them would be affected.


The bigger news is that it would be WA's first-ever income tax, along with the tax on capital gains income they just introduced. You can look at any historical example of introducing income tax in the US to see that the rates always expand to lower brackets over time.


Ahh, another favorite talking point. Yes, because the tax burden is already carried by the people you claim to worry about


Those people you wanna tax will just wfh from another state. Then you'll wonder why tax revenue is down and why no one is hiring.


People aren't leaving Seattle to save a small amount in taxes every year


I lived in the Seattle area and would be affected by some of these taxes. I moved to California recently. WA lost its tax advantage, so If I’m now going to be paying the same taxes, I might as well enjoy better weather and schools for my kids.


So, you _already_ moved, _for non tax reasons_


Maybe the opponents consider it a foot in the door; a wedge that can be expanded gradually to include lower tiers at lower percentages AKA the beginning of a WA State Income Tax. There are not few 400k households in Seattle.

The majority of states have one so it's not that big a deal, but it'll be less often said "I'm going to turn down this higher SF offer for Seattle b/c of lower COL...".

I'm not sure where the next refuge will be. Austin? Memphis?


And there is such small thing as state constitution that explicitly forbids any income tax.

Current government is using it as toilet paper, first by introducing capital gains tax, and now income tax.

I see in another comments though that you argue in bad faith by dismissing opponent arguments as “small amount”, “talking points”. If you don’t have anything real to say, don’t bother to answer.


The state constitution does not forbid an income tax. We both know it is more nuanced than that. Don't accuse me of bad faith in the same comment that you present an inaccuracy in the form of simplification that suits your argument


There is nothing nuanced about that. You look into 2 places and see read it for yourself. Stop spreading lies.

—-

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=1.90.100

RCWs > Title 1 > Chapter 1.90 > Section 1.90.100

RCW 1.90.100

Personal income tax prohibition.

Neither the state nor any county, city, or other local jurisdiction in the state of Washington may tax any individual person on any form of personal income. For the purposes of this chapter, "income" has the same meaning as "gross income" in 26 U.S.C. Sec. 61.

——

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim...

Gross income defined (a) General definition Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived from dealings in property; (4) Interest; (5) Rents; (6) Royalties; (7) Dividends; (8) Annuities; (9) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts; (10) Pensions; (11) Income from discharge of indebtedness; (12) Distributive share of partnership gross income; (13) Income in respect of a decedent; and (14) Income from an interest in an estate or trust.


Similar thing in California. And good ol' fronttunner for president Gavin Newsom is actively trying to kill it.

Just to remind you that he's still indeed an Establishment Democrat. He won't drown us in fascism, but he sure isn't fighting for the working class.


Fwiw I thought it was pretty self evident in your OP, and additionally that England is small enough to be a sufficient answer


I don't think OP is glad people came around on it


Their own data reports that they are holding tens of thousands of citizens who have committed no crimes.

They have murdered people in broad daylight and allowing many more to suffer and even die in their facilities.

People are not being hysterical, and the people who are downplaying or ignoring this are showing that they are in fact evil.


Tens of thousands of "citizens" or "residents"?

There's an important distinction here.


Citizens. US citizens


First they came for the "residents", and I said nothing, because there were important distinctions to be made...


So in other words your claim that they are holding tens of thousands of "citizens" is fabricated. cool, thanks for clearing that up.


I'm not the person you think you're replying to.

However, since you're here: etymological arguments are really not the win you should be chasing.


> Their own data reports that they are holding tens of thousands of citizens who have committed no crimes.

A source would be nice


It's easy to not see anything if you willingly close your eyes


Or what Upton Sinclair said.


This is really awesome


That's because it's a docs page. Product page here https://orionbrowser.com


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: