Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nandomrumber's commentslogin

The LED / LCD displays are probably lighter (less heavy), and someone figured they can save 0.001 gallons of diesel a year fleet wide if they replace displays.

Net Zero Fatigue is real.


Much more likely, I think, the mechanical displays had some maintenance cost which cheap LED displays will not.

You've confabulated a reason why they replaced them, linked it to initiative then complained about them doing it all in two sentences. A gold medal in mental gymnastics is warranted here!

They’re probably just cheaper and require less maintenance.

You’re not doing your cause any favors by projecting everything on an ill-fitting frame.


That display needs some Conway’s Game of Life action pronto.

they have a gif at the bottom of the article which looks like game of life

https://github.com/simpsoka/office-flipdisc/blob/main/scenes...


Dunno where your link is going, but yeah I see the gif at the bottom of the article now.

Still, I wanna see and hear it on the display.


Not an entirely unreasonable goal.

But also not present reality.

Share the road.

It works both ways.


Share the road.

It works both ways.


It does not work both ways.

One party to this is a high-inertia, potentially high-velocity metal box that, in an impact with the other party, typically results in an property insurance claim.

The other is a low-inertia flesh bag that, in an impact with the other party, results in a medical insurance claim, and possibly a funeral.


All the more reason to be aware of who you’re sharing the road with.

I spent a decade cycling for commute in a capital city in Australia. I’m also a tradesman, so I’m well aware that some people actually work on the road.

By being a pedestrian or cyclist, you’re literally in other people’s workplace.

Delivery drivers, construction workers, breakdown services, road maintenance, electricians, crane operators, cars for hire, emergency services, light rail operators.

As a pedestrian or cyclists, or motorbike rider, you’re particularly vulnerable.

Sometimes you need to get out of the way.

Share the road.


Working on the road does not give you priority on the roads. If anything, if you’re making money off it, maybe you should be more mindful of the commons you’re using for your profession.

Didn’t your mumma teach you to share.

Didn’t yours teach you to put some more thought into how you engage with other people?

It’s a bike lane not a road. It’s mine as a cyclist gtfo.

That's why a lot of these signs are being replaced with "cyclists use full lane".

Cars are violence now.

What next?


A stopped clock.

A broken clock can be broken in ways which result in it never being correct.


Those are just analog. If it's a broken digital clock, then all bets are off.

> their price everywhere is impacted by restriction on their trade anywhere.

That’s entirely a human fabrication.

Any country can decide at any time to simple give their fossil fuel reserves away.

Australia does, so I don’t see why any other country can’t do the same.

Also, your plan relies on the power electronics and industrial control systems used in solar / wind deployments not being backdoored, which isn’t a bet I’d be willing to make.


Giving their fossil fuel reserves away isn't exactly solving anything is it though? They happen to be giving the reserves away to foreign investors and thus driving domestic prices significantly higher then they aught to be.

It’s definitely solving for making someone else richer.

I’m lead believe it makes LNG less expensive for Japanese industry, which probably effects the price of goods manufactured in Japan.


> Blocking a developer that wants to buy wind turbines from another country and install them in the US does not make domestic energy cheaper or make domestic supply chains more resilient.

On the other hand, there are, what, approximately zero examples of where wind / solar market penetration is worth writing about and electricity has gotten cheaper.


Australian households will be able to access free electricity for three hours every day, in an effort to encourage energy use when excess solar power is being fed into the grid.

The federal government scheme will require retailers to offer free electricity to households for at least three hours in the middle of the day, when there is often more electricity generated than is being used, leading to very cheap or even negative wholesale prices.

Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen said the scheme would share around the benefits of solar panels, including to those without panels or who rented their homes.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-03/energy-retailers-offe...


Free electricity in the middle of the day.

That’ll come in handy for the, actually way too many people, who are home during the middle of the day.

And how does that help people who already have solar? Free electricity in the middle of the day doesn’t really help them.

And, actually, has this been implemented yet? It’s been 6 months since it was announced.


Moving the goalposts.

Well, has it been implemented?

I found this https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/three-hours-free-power-every-...

Which claims: This could save families up to $300 per year off their energy bills, and up to $1,070 if they have solar panels and batteries. Victoria’s Midday Power Saver offer will be available from 1 October 2026.

Oh look, you may save more if you already have solar and batteries. Yet another wealth transfer from the have-nots to the haves. Typical.

If you’re poor you could save up to less than a dollar a day.


> When you have a supply chain failure on oil and gas, you stop generating power.

Only if all oil and gas > energy production has one single point of failure.

In reality it’s much more distributed than that.


Sounds like marketing hype to me.

Geothermal reservoirs exist at depth.

Drilling horizontally doesn’t magically reduce the depth, nor the problem that drilling in to hot rock is like drilling in to plasticine, at least for temperatures worth working with.


In traditional fault hosted (not magmatic) geothermal the convection of the water up the fault brings the thermal energy closer to the surface where drilling depths are economical. This convection heats the surrounding rock and over hundred thousand - million of years brings the background temperature around a large volume at depth surrounding these systems considerably above traditional background geothermal gradients. By drilling into a much larger volume of impermeable hot rock surrounding a very small permeable fault hosted section you can considerably enhance the power potential of a traditional fault hosted geothermal system (the E in EGS). That is what Fervo is doing and why their projects are situated right next to traditional geothermal power plants.

The assumption is that if you can increase drilling efficiencies enough then you don't even need a fault hosted or similar system to bring that energy close to the surface, you can just drill down deep enough to get at similar temperatures. That is a big assumption in the economics.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: