Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | msla's commentslogin

It makes perfect sense: Rust compilers will never beat a human at scheduling every single opcode perfectly based on the deepest microarchitectural analysis short of decapping the chip and breaking out the ol' electron microscope. Whether it's worthwhile to be that efficient over a whole program, as opposed to a preternaturally tight compute kernel, is definitely questionable.

> Medicare For All

Nobody who relies on Medicare would say that. The people who say it want a fantasy Medicare that doesn't exist.

https://www.medicare.gov/providers-services/original-medicar...

Some of the items and services Medicare doesn’t cover include:

    Eye exams (for prescription eyeglasses)
    Long-term care
    Cosmetic surgery  
    Massage therapy
    Routine physical exams
    Hearing aids and exams for fitting them
    Most dental care: In most cases, Original Medicare doesn't cover dental services like routine cleanings, filings, tooth extractions, or items like dentures.

I rely on Medicare as a disabled person. I love it. The reduction in stress I experienced when I got to transition from my former employer plan to Medicare is pretty indescribable. I want every American to have at least this as a baseline.

Most of the complaints around Medicare come from those who get sold (conned) on takin Medicare “Advantage”, which is a privatized option for Medicare that denies a lot of coverage.


IIUC, the difference (for USG) of Medicare vs Medicare Advantage is that Medicare subsidizes the cost of a procedure done by a provider while Medicare Advantage (MA) pays a fixed rate per treatment to an insurer.

So if the MA rate is less than the provider changes then the insurer is highly incentivized to deny you coverage. While for Medicare you'd have a higher co-pay.

This also leads to scenarios where MA insurers upcode patients so that the treatment is at a higher rate [1]. (ex. Marking patients as recovering drug addicts when prescribing opioids to get both money from both counseling and the opioid treatment).

[1]: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/unitedhealth-grassley-me...


Just as a data point, depending on a country of course, the European public healthcare systems don't cover some/most/any of these either.

For example the eye exams for glasses are usually done at the store where you buy the glasses and included in the price, dental might be covered only for children, routine physical exams may not exist as a concept, etc.


My bad. I used that as a stand in for a single payer system like Medicare. Good idea, yes? Or do you object to that?

BTW There can still be a for-profit, premium health insurance market alongside. if you’re rich spend as much as you want on healthcare.


> My bad. I used that as a stand in for a single payer system like Medicare. Good idea, yes? Or do you object to that?

My objection to that is putting too much power over healthcare in the hands of the Federal government ends badly when someone like RFK Jr is in power in the Federal government.

My ideal is closer to the German system, with state-level public options which preserve private insurance.


But it covers everything that isn't those things? For free? Still sounds pretty good.

Incorrect according to who? You? Your Sainted Mother? Sounds innovative to me, and hardly traditional. Saying male is somehow gender neutral sounds even more bizarre.

No, usage makes correctness in language, not people trying to invent some weird conlang they wrongly insist is correct English.


> Incorrect according to who?

All my English teachers from Grades 1-12.

Using "they" as a singular pronoun would bring out the red pen.


Well, they were obviously incorrect.

With Windows, you get what you pay for.

In this case, that's an OS controlled by an unaccountable company that can take application software away from you.

Related: If you're the customer, you're the product.


Hmmm, so basically Google but you also pay for it?

ChromeOS and Android are definitely comparable.

Windows actually isn't very cheap.

agree, because "free" can be neither "cheap" nor "expensive"

It's not free at all. If you buy Windows through the official channels it's quite expensive. If you buy it on the grey market, it's dirt cheap, though.

And even if you pay $1,000,000/day to use it, it still spies on you and sells your data to outsiders.

Exactly, yet lots of people are happy to keep using it and paying the price to do so, despite the existence of free and far superior alternatives.

I see what you did there.

you can always either disable secureboot and driver signature verification, or (the better solution) just enroll your own certificate in your TPM and sign the driver with that...

Ah, yes, the [insert super inconvenient and complex thing to do that most people don’t know, want or should do] will solve it! And when that fails, surely the user can just write their own OS, right? Bunch of skill-issued complainers we the users are.

Well, the hope was always that those of us inconvenienced by M$ would all collectively contribute to making Linux distros more convenient for everyone. But we can't ever seem to get inconvenienced enough to actually sufficiently mobilize and/or coordinate such an effort.

It does seem like linux is having its moment right now. there's the money and effort valve is putting into KDE making the steamdeck and steammachine polished for their hardware which helps all users of KDE. cachyos is making having a rolling distro really smooth and snappy on old hardware and making games work mostly ootb. stuff like winboat and wine will let you use the few windows apps you need. you are kinda stuck though if you want to use something like fusion360 or solidworks. freecad has improved quite a bit but it's still like gimp where it's slightly worse UX in a lot of ways.

Valve is doing great work.

Now… maybe we could condense the 10,000 pointless distros down to a dozen? Oops, nope. Now 10,001, except this one has the menu bar in the middle of the screen and it moves around.


The distros are not pointless. For every one of them there was a human being that wanted something to work differently and the nature of open source let them do it. That should be celebrated and the day we loose that flexibility would be a very sad day.

This. Not to mention that for the mainstream users there are mainstream distros that are largely the same they have always been: Fedora, Ubuntu, Mint, so I never really understood the issue of having tons of distros out there for enthusiasts.

I think that both perspectives are right. We should celebrate diversity, but there's also power in consensus.

There needs to be some competition between ideas, but if every bit of disagreement about direction ends in "I'm going to build my own distro, with blackjack and hookers", then we as a community won't ever end up building something that can compete with the megacorps.


This.

It takes leaders. And people with vision. It seems the lack is there, and not at technical makers.


I mean, the super-easy option would be to just use BitLocker for FDE. No hassles, just works. But I fugured since everyone here on HN hates MS I wouldn't even bring that up. Don't trust MS? Enroll yourown keys

Yes use Bitlocker, the thing that uploads the encryption key to OneDrive "for convenience" thereby negating the whole point of FDE in the first place

by default, yes. Can be disabled with a single click. That's something that even your Grandma can do, as opposed to installing VeraCrypt (with dozens of options on what to encrypt, and how, and when, ...)

Well no actually I do not think either of my granmothers could have done that, nor would they have even known (or cared) what a Bitlocker even was.

> or (the better solution) just enroll your own certificate in your TPM and sign the driver with that...

I'll tell Grandma that's what she needs to do.


Make sure that she setup a PKI infrastructure to manage certificate revocation as well, wouldn't want a bad grandson to mess with it.

Why would you put Grandma on VeriCrypt in the first place? It's the more 'difficult' option for FDE.

What's easier, and bitlocker doesn't count. I want my FDE to be based on a password or a keyfile, not simply by some code in the motherboard. I want it encrypted until I, the operator, provide some data to unlock.

In my limited experience with bitlocker, the disk is decryptable automatically as long as it's in the original motherboard.


> and bitlocker doesn't count.

Wat? Bitlocker is the answer to your question.

> In my limited experience with bitlocker, the disk is decryptable automatically as long as it's in the original motherboard.

It's unlocked (not decrypted) when the OS boots, yes. You can optionally enforce (not on Home) other unlock methods, such as PIN before the OS boots.

> I want my FDE to be based on a password or a keyfile, not simply by some code in the motherboard.

That's less secure than TPM.


If someone steals my laptop, and there is no factor of decryption requiring something I possess or know, then the only use of that disk being encrypted is that I can throw it out more safely at end of life. Thieves/LEO has the data because they have the motherboard.

If bitlocker has a PIN/passphrase decrypt option, then I missed it.


While a thief or LEO could boot the OS, just having the motherboard doesn’t give them access to the underlying data. They would need to have a valid user account.

you should protect your account with a password of course. that will be used to decrypt your drive/data

It was not made clear to me that my username/password was the decryption method! I was expecting something like Linux where a separate password is needed.

Furthermore it wasn't intuitive to me that my user account would decrypt more than just my home directory.


your grandma is probably fine with BitLocker....

And they say Linux is inconvenient because you have to open the terminal every once in a while.

They're coming for the jobs immigrants would be taking if the Japanese government weren't so xenophobic.

This is explicitly part of the discourse, but I think it means robotics companies continuing to receive government grants while not actually delivering any labor saving technology, and immigration policy being held back. The industries needing labor will not get a suitable solution, the economy will continue to suffer, but the psychology of those around the world who believe in racial order, and correct positions of alleles on geography, will remain soothed.

What is the point of letting in immigrants if they won't have jobs.

[flagged]


> They look at what happens to people that aren't xenophobic and they don't want that.

They did sakoku before the technological means that would even allow them to see this was a thing. It's baked deep in the culture.


Why does Japan need immigrants? Japan is one of the safest countries in the world because of its immigration policies.

> japan is going to shit because of all the immigrants

> japan is better than pussy thanks to it being strict on immigrants

pick whichever convenient


This should be the top comment :)

Well, that leaves the Pentium family, doesn't it?

I wonder how far we are from the removal of all 32-bit x86 support from the mainline Linux kernel.


I think Pentium will still be supported. i486 refers to very old 32 bits CPU (80486). The article is not clear but by default I tend to think that i586 and i686 will still be supported.

"Pentium" also refers to a 30-year range of CPUs with very different capabilities. I suspect that removing (say) P5-specific kludges would also not cause too much grief given it's over thirty years old and dates from about the same time as the newer 486s. At some point you need to clean out the cruft a bit.

Support for the Pentium isn't going away now, certainly, and nobody's announced plans to drop it from the Linux kernel, but every architecture has a time horizon.

There are still 32 bit x86 PCs sold today for embedded applications, I'm pretty sure.

yep aren't most fridges and ovens etc using 386DXs?

Maybe it's all ARM Cortex now? I thought the 386 was still in production.


A bit less than 50% of the whole Internet.

Wow. That's so amazingly unpopular. Why anyone bothers talking about something untold millions of people use every day is beyond me.


WebAssembly version with photo-realistic GUI. Run a PDP-11/34 in your browser:

https://dbrll.github.io/ll-34/


Is this a case of "It Just Works" or "You're Holding It Wrong"?


Are they some ancient small-scale integration VLSI design? Do they broadcast on a low-frequency VHF band? Face it: Oxymorons like those are part of the technical world. "VLSI" was a current term back when whole CPUs were made out of fewer transistors than we use for register files now, and "VHF" is low frequency even by commercial broadcasting standards.


haha, yea they are part of it for sure, and I'm not dunking on the use of them, but I rather smile a bit when I stumble upon them.

Like (~9K) Jumbo Frames!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: