I used to partake in all RAM discussions online. Here, reddit, every technical hardware forum and anywhere workstations were being talked about.
The sentiment was always ECC is a waste and a scam. My goodness the unhinged posts from people who thought it was a trick and couldn't fathom you don't know you're having bits flipped without it. "it's a rip off" without even looking and seeinf often the price was just that of the extra chip.
I've discussed it for 20 years since the first Mac Pro and people just did not want to hear that it had any use. Even after the Google study.
Consumers giving professionals advice. Was same with workstation graphics cards.
Very bizarre, as I also found it helped with this! I was only a First Officer at the time, but even as a Captain today I find playing 2048 during take off and landing really helps.
Wait, you're a Captain, and you fear of taking off and landing? I have so many questions :). Also, as someone who is scared of taking off and landing, I'm even more scared now.
Probably with Doctor. An actual scientist might come above Lawyer/Doctor (and below Artist/Designer), but this is a rather recent upwards move, as it became cooler to be smart (note this does not apply to engineers, who are looked down upon by scientists anyway)
> " I guess you don't really know that you needed ECC until it's too late."
I spent many years on hardware consultation and was amazed at the all the times I had to explain it was just a what if insurance like any other things their business was mitigating against. Sometimes they'd even decided they needed to save costs in non-ecc ram when it was $4 a gb in difference, or (during the FB-DIMM era) there wasn't even an option to avoid it.
Never really understood the resistance towards it.
Maybe the lack of evidence before the Google study and people thinking RAM manufacturers were trying to rip them off or something.
The "never had a problem so why would I need" it attitude with no way to know if an issue was caused by a bit flip was most baffling.
reply