Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lazzurs's commentslogin

I couldn't get over this after moving here from the UK where you can pick up a pack for 10p in a supermarket.


Yeah, I lived in the UK before and it's a bit mad.

You can't buy antihistamines either, only in pharmacies and they are quite expensive. I remember you could get them in Tesco or Asda for like £2.


A window in Russia is likely far more deadly than any of the western security services.


All these comments and not one single reference to Airwolf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airwolf


Under "Plot", I see:

    > The fictional Airwolf is an advanced prototype supersonic helicopter with stealth capabilities and a formidable arsenal.
I watched that show for years as a kid. I never knew it was both supersonic and stealth. Damn, DARPA must be jealous.


One of the truly great things from my old homeland. In the year 2000 Falkirk invented the wheel...


There are still some Neanderthals in Falkirk now shouting at hotels.


Yes, sadly aware. It's never a good thing to see the old homeland in the news.


This is exactly the sort of thing a government should be doing in a free market. Fair access to pricing information is essential to the operation of a free market. Now do this for all EV charging stations.


Ha! If you look into that you’ll find they tried and then the “free service” was somehow insidiously overtaken by private companies with vested interests in listing their own charge points.


Encouraging car use is exactly the sort of things governments should not be doing!!!


This is not encouraging car use


About a year ago I had to buy a new Xbox. It took me time to figure out what model I had and what the new models are. It’s the least intuitive marketing on the market.


A physical keyboard like a Treo/Palm Pre, enough storage to store all my photos and say GrapheneOS and I would be in.


Happy Hogmanay to everyone in HN land.


Sir Leon Bagrit covered this topic in the first BBC Reith Lecture and it’s worth a read/listen if you’re interested in this topic.

https://archive.org/details/ageofautomation0000sirl/mode/1up

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00hbdmj


Making the two new UK aircraft carriers dependent on natural gas has to be one of the worst military procurement decisions of the modern era.


In World War II, it was in hindsight a poor decision for the Royal Navy to stick with coal and an expectation of nearby friendly ports to refuel. The USN having oil-burning ships that could be more easily refuelled at sea meant an increased range and this made a difference in the pacific with most formerly friendly ports in the hands of the enemy. The Royal Navy may have been less happy with oil than coal due to not having a source on the British mainland.

Today, it seems unlikely that a Royal Navy aircraft carrier will be far from friendly ports. More likely for it to be used to launch air attacks against a relatively weak adversary (think of something like the military actions near the Arabian peninsula in the last 50 years or so). There are also Royal Navy oilers and other logistics ships that can replenish fuel or other resources.


Its fuelled with diesel, not natural gas. And all carriers need refuel at some point for their embarked aircraft.


Sounds like it is time to dust off those nuclear-powered airplane blueprints from the 60s!


The USN have a research project around using electricity to produce synthetic fuel from sea water.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: