Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | krige's commentslogin

Doesn't decaf also contain caffeine, just a lot less of it?

Looking at Victor Hugo's entry I immediately spotted this

> After yet another three years’ space the author of La Légende des siècles reappeared as the author of Les Misérables, the greatest epic and dramatic work of fiction ever created or conceived: the epic of a soul transfigured and redeemed, purified by heroism and glorified through suffering; the tragedy and the comedy of life at its darkest and its brightest, of humanity at its best and at its worst.

Sure sounds like someone was a (fellow) fan.


> I mean, who told us that smartphones with user-replaceable batteries are better than smartphones that are 0.5 mm thinner because their batteries are non-replaceable? The same people who want to ban encryption? Even apart from the ad-hominem FUD argumentation, currently, it's the people who refuse to ban encryption even after it was pushed to them multiple times.

This argument is neither an ad hominem attack nor FUD. If you don’t like the pig trough analogy, I’ll be happy to rephrase it for you: when I buy something, I just go to the store and buy it. There are a few areas of personal interest where I’m more selective about what I buy, but generally speaking, I just grab whatever’s right at the front of the shelf, within arm’s reach, and looks roughly like what I want. If you look at consumers as a whole, that’s the best approximation of their behavior.

The ban on encryption is a good counterpoint! I’m not saying that everything the regulators want to do is good or in line with my views. But ultimately, I want to live in a world where policymakers set the framework and the market finds good solutions within that framework, not in a world where market players are given completely free rein and every political intervention is viewed as if someone had licked the sacred shrine of a deity with their tongue.


Enough with the ace combat fanfics. In a serious drone war a neutral cargo ship would not be allowed to hang around with potentially a shitload of drones in its containers.

In a serious drone war, the cargo ship wouldn't know it was carrying containers full of drones, as we saw in Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb[0].

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spiderweb


They have already lost two in the first real conflict. Doesn't seem like it's all that capable.

Designing for zero loss in a major war is way more expensive than we can undertake.

I mean, we did that too. That's why there are only 19 operational B-2s (21 built).

Or maybe without GDScript the engine would not get the traction it has and would not have the resources to do anything at all.

Imaginary scenarios are cool once you realize that NOT X does not follow with THEN Y FOR SURE.


> Or maybe without GDScript the engine would not get the traction it has and would not have the resources to do anything at all.

Or the developers might not find C# to be as interesting to work on and some people that stick around in part due to getting to iterate on GDScript wouldn’t contribute at all! All of those are possibilities, that’s for sure, Godot definitely has a lot of appeal due to fast prototyping too!


I have that Sachs Lagoon image printed on my wall, it's gorgeous.

Windows Phone had a damn lot more personality than android or iphone back then, let alone now.

AFAIR this comes up visually when infected with certain diseases.

Number theorist Jared Lichtman is also involved with an AI startup so he might have a bit of an incentive to frame things this way.

Source: https://www.math.inc/a-conversation-with-terry-tao

However, I think this is still likely a very significant achievement/milestone.


Thank you, that feels like important context!

This guy also says it's a book proof though:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bloom


Important context too, thanks! More context:

- Thomas Bloom is the current owner of https://www.erdosproblems.com/

- He previously posted on X on the 2025/10/17 the following:

> Hi, as the owner/maintainer of http://erdosproblems.com, this is a dramatic misrepresentation. GPT-5 found references, which solved these problems, that I personally was unaware of. The 'open' status only means I personally am unaware of a paper which solves it. [1]

> GPT-5 has been a very useful tool in searching the literature, and this has been a valuable addition to the website. Its literature searching ability is already useful and impressive enough, no need to describe it as something it's not! [2]

[1]: https://x.com/thomasfbloom/status/1979254235075059732

[2]: https://x.com/thomasfbloom/status/1979254675833549207

I don't have the mathematical chops or knowledge of mathematicians to evaluate any of that.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: