Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | guipsp's commentslogin

The Linux kernel is pretty small

This does still look like it uses XLA, fwiw.

It is not a stupid concern, butt there is architecture around making sure you can't just save a request for later and replay it


It is mostly developed by AMD and used to be hosted on the AMD github iirc


You cannot explain everything to everyone all the time. Besides, this is not even a paper. Sometimes you are not the target audience and have to put some words into Google.


While that is true, it's not like I can use two laptops at once


The hotel can just not offer free cancelation


The irony, hotel industry is among the cheapest.


You might be mixing up LXC and LXD


From Incus main page:

> The Incus project was created by Aleksa Sarai as a community driven alternative to Canonical's LXD. Today, it's led and maintained by many of the same people that once created LXD.

Thé confusion si real


Even I that worked for a long while with this tech would mix them up time and again, I think it's understandable.


No, LXD’s LXCs. I use it and it’s good.

The UID mappings are correctly setup in Ubuntu so the containers run non-privileged by default.

I hear Incus, a fork of LXD, is better. It’s used in truenas.


The link you posted explains exactly why they threw it away. You may disagree, but the stakeholders did not.


Yes, I know. And I know iXsystems folks too. If you want stable, battle-tested ZFS, Solaris is the only supportable option on Sun hardware like the good ol' (legacy) Thumper. OpenZFS isn't tested well enough and there's too much hype and religious zealotry around it. For person use, it's probably fine for some people but, at this point, semi alternatives such as xfs and btrfs [thanks to Meta] have billions more hours of production usage.


There are no checksums for data in xfs, and there is also no way to create a raid. There is also no data compression. Raid 5 and raid 6 are still unstable in btrfs. What alternative are we talking about?


Look at the parent dir. I agree it is a bit confusing


Ah! Yup, that works, I can compile the binary. I get an "Illegal instruction" error when I run it but that's probably just because M1 doesn't support some of the NEON instructions. I retract my implicit AI-slop accusations.


Results from M1 Pro (after setting CPU=native in the makefile): https://gist.github.com/DavidBuchanan314/e3cde76e4dab2758ec4...


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: