Last time I head of them, Bosch was planning to cut 13000 jobs in Germany.

Well, the National People's Congress / CCP define and frame that practically for you.

It's not like 1.4 billion Chinese have much say in that.

If I am wrong, please remind me again how much say Chinese people had on the escape hatches of Article 51 in your constitution.

I guess Alex Pretti and Renee Good didn't get much say in whether they should be killed by the US federal government.

Let me remind you that none of their killers wearing US federal agency uniforms have been charged. I thought their rights were covered by their constitution, that was a mistake.

Both of those killings sparked protests, and are subject to ongoing investigations and lawsuits.

Platformio is not simple by any means. That few .ini files generate a whole bunch of python, and this again relies on scons as build system.

That's a nice experience as long as you stay within predefined, simple abstractions that somebody else provided. But it is very much a scripted build system, you just don't see it for trivial cases.

For customizations, let alone a new platform, you will end up writing python scripts, and digging through the 200 pages documentation when things go wrong.

Are you ignoring the codex desktop app on purpose? Or the integrations?

Those use cases are already actively implemented, or being implemented in current software. The 5-10 year estimate is wildly wrong.

You do not need a plugin anymore.

People are accountable for the results they produce using AI. So a scientist is responsible for made up sources in their paper, which is plain fraud.

"responsible for made up sources" leads to the hilarious idea that if you cite a paper that doesn't exist, you're now obliged to write that paper (getting it retroactively published might be a challenge though)

I completely agree. But “disclosing the use of AI” doesn’t solve that one bit.

I don’t disclose what keyboard I use to write my code or if I applied spellcheck afterward. The result is 100% theirs.

Getting an automated reply concerning the submitted issue is deeply iconic.

> CCC always has been explicit far left/green, looking at its history, as other people in here have mentioned.

Yes, but what has shifted is "the left", to a point were it has basically been taken over for very specific agendas.

> I suspect that Chinese models are largely forced to open source as a trust building step because of general China-phobia in the west.

The obvious bias of the models, when it comes to Chinese politics and history, certainly does not help here.

TBF it obvious to us , in the same way many of our own bias are not obvious to us.