Time to irradiate all mails

Still want to know what happened in first 10 second of launch, why were the videos fuzzy and cutting out (at least twice)????

There's always a state civil court.

400 transfems at Olympic events is rare?

first of all, you need a source for 400. 2nd of all 400/11000 athletes is 3%. that's roughly inline with population statistics in the 15-25 demographic

> 2nd of all 400/11000 athletes is 3%. that's roughly inline with population statistics in the 15-25 demographic

No its not 3% for the world, for USA maybe but most countries barely have any trans people at all.

Here's a helpful map of cultures with transgendered subsets that are accepted in society. Cultures on every continent have a deep historical record of transgendered folks.

https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-...

barely any openly trans people, maybe, because it's highly illegal

You can opt-in for a "no visual echo" of any character (asterisk or not) for password prompts:

----

For KDE:

    sudo vim /etc/sddm.conf.d/hide-password.conf

insert in:

    [Greeter]
    ShowPasswordEcho=false

then reboot.

----

For `sudo`:

    sudo vim /etc/sudoers.d/password-no-visual-echo

Insert/replace `Defaults` with:

    Defaults !pwfeedback

----

For GNOME, you have to modify `unlockDialog.js`

    sudo vim /usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/unlockDialog.js

And do one of the following (version-specific):

    this._passwordEntry.clutter_text.set_password_char('');

or in newer version, replace `echo_char` with `null`. Reboot required.

Or just replace sudo-rs with sudo.

Opinionated security tools maintainers rarely get it right.

Can I change my password char to an emoji?

Only with GNOME

The "cinfiguration" for GNOME actually modifies the source code, so if that's the bar, you can do it everywhere. :)

In that case, I'll make mine echo a random number of characters pee key stroke. The feedback is nice but then there are no worries about someone observing password length.

I mean, Gnome being in JavaScript makes it easier

Yes, easier for hacker to tweak

I mean, that's the point yes

Meanwhile we are still knocking off ghost stations for false reporting with subtle increases of warming trends.

USHCN Stations, like 342944 (Erick, OK), 80228 (Arcadia, FL(, and 235541 (Mexico, MO)

A full list is on:

https://x.com/search?q=%23NOAAghoststations&src=typed_query&...

Like in Old Dominiom Jihadist incident, after had stabbed a professor in a classroom full of highly-trained cadet students, got himself stabbed 22 times, broke 9 of his ribs, breath withheld, turned his head 180-degrees and broke his neck before committing suicide?

John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and Thomas Jefferson all wrote about using pseudonyms when discussing policy, procedures, and ideas.

Not seeing any support for that.

Let's call it "Ad machinam".

A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has.

Example usage:

“That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”

And really when you think about it, all AI is is just the a statical recombination of (almost) everything that (almost) everyone has written.

So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.

Almost like reject the argument because the logical reasoning was supplied emotionally.

Still waiting for that magical single login, activating many window managers across multiple PCs.

Also, protect screenshot with permissions.