Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dcchambers's commentslogin

The Department of Defense is now the Department of War. They've made their goals clear.

You are not in defense contracting. You are in the business of war contracting.

Take from that what you will.


So it turns out Anthropic was gaslighting everyone on twitter about this then? Swearing that nothing had changed and people were imagining the models got worse?

Nope, they were technical correct. Nothing had changed with the model. The model had not gotten any worse.

The harness on the other hand. Now that had problems.


"Tim Cook to become Apple Executive Chairman"

*John Ternus to become Apple CEO*

Talk about burying the lede, lmao.


Yeah. Can we get a title change please?

Among the dup stories submitted, this one has the best content but the worst title.


I'll definitely put this into the "good problem to have" category.

The eclipse photos are absolutely jaw-dropping.


Does performance not matter?

What if your AI uses an O(n) algorithm in a function when an O(log n) implementation exists? The output would still be "correct"


> Does performance not matter?

No, unfortunately. In a past life, in response to an uptime crisis, I drove a multi-quarter company-wide initiative to optimize performance and efficiency, and we still did not manage to change the company culture regarding performance.

If it does not move any metrics that execs care about, it doesn't matter.

The industry adage has been "engineer time is much more expensive than machine time," which has been used to excuse way too much bloated and non-performant code shipped to production. However, I think AI can actually change things for the better. Firstly, IME it tends to generate algorithmically efficient code by default, and generally only fails to do so if it lacks the necessary context (e.g. now knowing that an input is sorted.)

More importantly though, now engineer time is machine time. There is now very little excuse to avoid extensive refactoring to do things "the right way."


> Does performance not matter?

Performance can be a direct target in a feedback loop and optimised away. That's the easy part. Taking an idea and poof-ing a working implementation is the hard part.


Also most performance optimisations exit at the microservice architecture level, or db and io level


As it stands today the average engineer is much more likely to ship an unoptimized algorithm than an AI.


If it's not tested, it's not Engineered.

Test what you care about. If you care about performance, then test your performance. Otherwise performance doesn't matter.


In most cases no. Bottleneck is usual IO.


Generative video is insanely expensive and OpenAI is burning through money. They need to use the compute on things that they actually might make money on - like enterprise Codex usage.

OpenAI is bleeding money faster than they can afford to and they are literally running out of people that they can go to for more. They need to stop the bleeding.


For now...


The best satire is that which becomes reality.


I would posit that the best satire is that which holds a clear enough mirror to society that people choose for it to not come to pass.


Best comment here!


There's literally nothing that can be done about it. The people with actual ability to make a change don't care.

We're going to have to figure out how to adapt to it. Expect many of the things you love now (seafood, coffee, etc) to be gone within your lifetime.


There were voters who could do part of it. Long term, having a US President that doesn’t cancel wind projects, tear up EV subsidies, and promote coal would probably be a difference maker for US emissions.

And if the voters were just a bit smarter and not bought into the “China bad” narrative, we might even get proper, nice, affordable EVs in the US.


Here's the thing: NOTHING we do in the US matters when various Southeast Asian countries are rapidly industrializing. And in the rapid growth phase sustainability and clean energy is not a priority.

Then there's a billion and a half people in Africa, also rapidly growing, that may be next.


Optimistically I'm hoping they're just bridging the gap to produce a ton of solar energy. Can't be upset until they eclipse the USA emissions.

Although I'm surprised China doesn't just build nuke plants.


Trump is still all bluster and words. He can't change the math. I've convinced 2 people to get EVs over ICE this year. They still make economic sense even without federal subsidies (dependent on your home/work situation). Though I don't deny that most OEMs are likely selling at a loss now. It's foolish how foreign wars directly affect how much it costs you to get to work.


I agree with this basically 100%.

> Say no by default — every feature has a hidden cost: complexity, maintenance, edge cases

AI-assisted development is blowing up this long-standing axiom in the software development world, and I am afraid it's a terrible thing.

Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: