Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | clarkmoody's commentslogin

> heavy new 8% tax on our endowment returns

Cry me a river.


Our best universities have massive endowments is a national asset

Insider trading laws are for the plebs. Tip off your cousin about an acquisition by a public company? Go to prison. Tip off your cronies about war? Business as usual.

"The U.S. Department of Justice said Wednesday that it had charged 30 people allegedly linked with a decade-long insider trading scheme involving high-profile law firms."

https://www.newsweek.com/premier-law-firms-spy-ring-11920914


Let me guess, these guys said something bad about Trump? Not that it means that they didn’t do it, just that they would not have gotten charged otherwise.

The list doesn't corroborate that. The international component seems important.

Honestly, insider trading laws should be removed since they manipulate markets. If you know things, make moves that are public, that would price things _more_ accurately.

It's easy to know something accurately when you are the one causing it.

Own nothing, be happy


Simmons opened new frontiers of thought for me with his Hyperion Cantos. A house with each room on a different planet. A heartbreaking tale of a daughter aging in reverse. A romance playing out over space and time. A grand piano on the pop-out balcony of a starship. The cruciform parasite. The Shrike.

Branches of humanity torn between decadent stagnation and radical evolution. The artificial intelligence civilization with its own agenda. The All Thing (Internet) as the third branch of government.

So much good stuff, published in 1989 no less.

Rest in Peace to a true legend.


Oh, boy. The Shrike. That thing still haunts me in a way that no other monster or alien across all of Sci-fi or fantasy really does. It's something about the inscrutability of it, especially in the first novel (still my favorite) where its purpose and backstory haven't been revealed. Sure, it's scary, but I think the mystery of its motives - and its ability to unpredictably act apparently benevolently sometimes - is where the real terror lies.


He predicted social media as well. So many themes in this work only mentioned in passing, too many to develop in full...


> A house with each room on a different planet.

My favourite part of that is the design of the house included a joke (I can't remember what the joke was, but that's not the point).


The bathroom was on a raft floating on the surface of an ocean planet.


Rule #1 of power: never outshine the master


The FBI won't get involved unless it's politically advantageous.


Wait until your local police force has fully autonomous lethal robots on the streets.


This one isn't actually inevitable in the near term. Lethal robots policing the streets isn't something that can just sneak up on us[0] - it's a pretty clear-cut civic issue affecting everyone, so excepting hardcore autocracies with no vertical accountability[1], the public can push such ideas back indefinitely[2].

It's hard to "agency launder" a killer robot when it's physically patrolling a public square.

--

[0] - Except maybe through privatization of law enforcement, which could be more gradual - think police outsourcing more work to private security companies, which in turn decide to "pioneer innovative solutions to ensure personal safety" by giving weapons to mall security patrol robots and putting them out on the streets - but it'll still be pretty obvious what's happening.

[1] - Some cursory search suggests this is the correct term for the idea I'm thinking of, which is how much the people in power have to, in practice, take their subjects' reactions into account.

[2] - Well, at least until armed forces of multiple countries start using autonomous robots as ground infantry, and over the years, normalize this idea in the minds of civilians.


...and then what happened?


it’s in the discovery process with a deadline of February 23rd, at which time kellogg’s is to prepare their argument and motion for summary judgement. If that’s denied it tentatively goes to 3-4 day trial in July.

Court listener:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70447787/kellogg-north-...

Pacer (requires account, but most recent doc summarized )

https://ecf.ohnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/141014086025?caseid=31782...


I never saw them again (and I host large food truck festivals here) so I just assumed they threw in the towel. I did not know they are still operating but apparently so.

I have to imagine they’ll spend more time and money fighting this suit than they did starting the food truck. I see no reason you wouldn’t just rebrand. The name is mid at best anyway.

But also, I’m kinda rooting for them. From a distance though.



Could they have gotten around this by actually serving Eggo waffles? Would that have then fallen under nominative fair use?


I doubt it, no. I couldn’t go buy Taco Bell sauce at the store, serve it at my restaurant, and call my restaurant Taco Bell.

They could probably mention it on their menu.


I'm guessing (NAL) that would actually make it worse. Trademark violation revolves around brand confusion. If you actually serve their product you are making that _much_ more likely (in my uninformed opinion anyway).

Otherwise it's a standalone argument about a stupid pun applied to food in general.


He uses the word "fascism" without any relationship to that word's meaning.


The ballot has always been a proxy for the bayonet.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: