Can you estimate what proportion of fraud is automated/bot/scripted versus manual human interaction? Do you rely much on botnet detection or IP reputation?
Card testing doesn’t require a purchase, fraudsters can validate a card by adding it to an online wallet. The retailer will send a $0 authorization to the bank.
Fraud happens across all transaction amounts, what do you think people use the cards for once they buy or guess a valid card?
$0 authorizations are routinely skipped, though - the fees add up substantially because of card testing, some card networks don't support it (and instead you need $1 or similar), and it can be confusing for customers.
Call it Blazor weirdness then. This obviously wasn’t a swipe at Microsoft being closed, just a point that Blazor stuff is not general standard web stuff.
People are conflating consistency of a design system with consistency of ux metaphors. I worked on the team that built the new home page dashboard and my experience with the components and associated guidance was excellent.
It is not the fault of the design system that service teams, for example, created 5 different interactions for deleting a resource.
AWS leaned hard into building as many services as possible, at the expense of console ui consistency. There is now a swing back toward consistency, and I expect to see more improvements at the "consistent metaphors" level soon.
Yeah, nobody cares about the console. Its really unfortunate. Adding console parity for new features was always an afterthought, and code quality was absolutely terrible for my service. Also we used nodejs 8 up until last year. What a mess.
I think it is getting better, but it’s incredible that it was neglected for so long.
Have not yet tried printing and folding one yet
reply