I'm commenting only because I have recently submitted a similar story [0] and although I copied and pasted the title, it was also missing the exact word "millions". I had to edit the post and add it. I'm curious why it has happened twice? Is there a filter that tries to moderate exaggeration perhaps?
There is another one: https://libredirect.github.io/
A web extension that redirects YouTube, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok and many other websites to alternative privacy-friendly frontends.
This is a fork of no longer maintained Privacy Redirect.
Alternative frontends are fetched automatically, so it mostly works out of the box.
I'm glad you like it! It's been wonderful for me as well. The creators recently released a book called Born to Flourish[1]—if you're interested, I can share the eBook and/or Audiobook.
I don't think that "right almost every time" is enough. It's different when you're searching for an answer yourself and you're expecting to dig for right one among others not so right. But when you get one answer from LLM you either trust it or don't. If you do you're bound to be lied to from time to time and face the consequences. If you don't, you're back to searching manually anyway.
I find myself questioning LLMs a healthy habit these days.
Well, maybe look closer before sharing premature conclusions and speculation as if they're news?
Current title is incorrect and ragebait. Lunduke's already known for stirring shit and making a murder out of the tinyest of feathers. The most disappointing thing in this story besides the flaming of maintainers is people still taking L's rants seriously. He's DoSing community attention and you're falling for it.
From an r/ArchLinux moderator responding to a censored user:
"I got a DM from much higher up the chain asking me to remove it. Whilst I technically don't answer to them, I do respect their wishes. They don't like someone they consider as part of the core dev teams being called out like that. What you did broke the Arch Linux CoC."
"""Actually they rejected the PR and just didn’t want to be distracted with endless flame wars over something they’ve already resolved.
To attack open source:
1. Request a controversial and stupid change knowing it will be rejected.
2. Keep talking about it and call people names.
3. When they close your thread cry censorship.
4. When they explain why they closed it cry louder that they just don’t want an open debate.
5. When they explain they already resolved the issue by closing the PR so there is no need for a debate go back to step 1.
Of course you need a couple different accounts to do this, but that’s easy enough."""
Am I going to wade through X/Twitter drama to figure things out? No.
Does that comment imply you are spreading the drama flames? Yes.
Deeper down, "This reddit case is obscure. I searched the forum of Arch for "Age Verification". It does NOT give a feeling of approval from the Arch community. So no conclusions on their stance. bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.…" -- linking to a page I can't read.
People seem to be dumping on Arch based on pure hearsay.
I feel dirty after reading comments about "all the hidden cucks getting exposed" and "some linux "hackers" at a local ISP and they were all woke AF ... lectured me on using the word "retard" ... they eat chemicals that turn them into soy jacks"
OP? Get off Twitter/X. It's bad for your mental well-being.
GDPR fines are up to 10 Million Euros or 2% of total global revenue, whichever is higher. Maybe an EU citizen should sue them, since that behavior is listed as a dark pattern in the guidance.
Anyone can report them for investigation. I forget what the contact email address is but I had to add it to my GDPR compliance page so I know it exists.
BBC, Deutsche Welle, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, Sound of Hope etcetc actually setup special stations around the soviet bloc countries in an action that could viewed as equally clandestine as the jammers that were trying to silence them.
Given the connection with a one-time pad, I wonder why the article refers to the technique as "cryptology". Wouldn't "cryptography" be the correct term, given the security afforded by a one-time pad is unmatched?
I'm commenting only because I have recently submitted a similar story [0] and although I copied and pasted the title, it was also missing the exact word "millions". I had to edit the post and add it. I'm curious why it has happened twice? Is there a filter that tries to moderate exaggeration perhaps?
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678393
reply