Interesting, for me your "permalink" shows SSD labeled as DDR4/DDR5, cooler named as CPU, "Praer Caplu", no M.2, etc. I guess it regenerates images ever so often, so can't predict what will be shown next time.
Sorry, you have been blocked. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.
Did I ever open this website? I guess no. Did I ever attack this website (or did any AI crawling)? Also no. Implying the allegation is criminal, Cloudflare falsely accused me, should I seek legal counsel?
I still was able to access the article via webarchive. And what I want to say, from my POV, I've done nothing wrong, website owners attack me. I don't see it every day, but I think it is more often than cases when people are kicking AI-powered food delivery robots.
That is a standard Cloudflare response when a URL is blocked. It was a temporary block affecting ALL traffic to the URL while I updated the post, not a block targeted at anyone in particular.
No, I am still blocked (for every page on https://stephvee.ca/). "Cloudflare Ray ID: 9efd477aef431473", if it helps somehow. My IP is not in any common blocklist, I experience no errors with other Cloudflare protected websites (using standard Chrome on Linux). It is very likely that stephvee.ca is configured excessively strict (rejecting by OS, or by large IP ranges, or idk)
Apologies. :( Since you say you've never visited the website before, then that means you're either in one of the countries or in one of the residential IP ranges that I've had to block. I had to do that a while back, as I'd say roughly 99.9% of the traffic I received from those areas was malicious in nature (e.g. constantly spamming the site 24/7 for .env variables and whatnot, as well as crawling every single page on the site hundreds or even thousands of times every day). I couldn't block this traffic at the individual IP level, as there's simply too much of it, and they just move on to a different IP address when they're blocked.
I can't stand the thought of blocking an actual human being who just wants to look at my site, but at the same time, what do you do? Just let the site be hammered by crawlers and scrapers 24/7 for the sake of less than a handful of human visitors every once in a while?
People who don't run websites (I'm not saying this is you, just in general) have no idea how bad the crawling/scraping problem is right now. I don't even WANT to use Cloudflare, but I feel like I have no choice. It's either use Cloudflare, or pay an arm and a leg to host a hobby website and then have all my bandwidth chewed up by the crawlers and scrapers.
The people and companies who run these bots are making the internet such a hostile place. It's especially infuriating that so many of them don't even identify themselves with user agents, and hide behind residential IPs instead.
EDIT: Oh, and I can confirm: I investigated the ray ID, and yes, it was unfortunately a country block that triggered it. I receive a huge amount of bad traffic from your country every single day (mostly credential exploits), and I'm sorry you got caught up unintentionally in that block. I added an exception that should hopefully work, though, in the event that you do still want to visit.
You forget that Polymarket is just a casino, and the house always wins.
For example, recent events show that any bet can be selectively disputed by arbitrary reason ("we found insiders", "we found this immoral/illegal", etc.).
The problem is that it is still a slop: not only it adds a lot of noise ("architecture" diagrams based on some cherry-picked filenames, incomplete datatables, hyperfocusing on strange things), it also hallucinates, adding factually incorrect information (while direct questions to LLM shows correct information).
2) Please don't call black overlay rectangles as "Redact" - it is maliciously misleading. I checked https://pdfcrowd.com/inspect-pdf/ and I see original parts that I covered with these rectangles (images are stored twice: as originals and as images with cut out regions).
Nightshade[1] 2.0? As if both tools were built by incompetent developer to distract attention from a real solution - publishing an llm-friendly version in an machine-friendly format (which is not really difficult and helps not only LLMs: e. g. cache, disable fancy complex syntax highlight, offload to github, provide clients and MCPs, optimize clients for common use cases). This example is simply a failure:
<a href="/bots" style="display: none;" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="1">
Amazing high quality data here!
</a>
Dumb curl-based LLM won't visit display:none links. Smarter browser-based navigators won't even render this link.
But the header is just "90% of Claude-linked output going to GitHub repos w <2 stars". No conclusion, just some random fact.
The problem is that this title is editorialized, and the fact is cherry-picked. Why not =0? Why not >1000? This is just a dashboard, it highlights "Interesting Observations", but stars statistics is not there.
Good ol Putin's strategy, even visually similar to Natalia Poklonskaya, used to push political agendas in wartime, used to divert attention from actual problems and fill headlines, while other topics become inaccessible due to war censorship.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was proposed by the same political strategists. AI is not really needed here.
reply