True, it's better than most for sure and I agree it used to be better. Though a lot of other software for windows and linux are really not that great so the bar is probably on the lower end.

Does anyone know if these or similar techniques are still used in today's suits production?

love it!

Nice work and thanks for sharing it!

Now, I ask, have LLMs ben demystified to you? :D

I am still impressed how much (for the most part) trivial statistics and a lot of compute can do.

I never got OpenClaw and I'm unsure what this means exactly. Would it be just that you can't put your Anthropic API Key/credentials in OpenClaw and use it? Sounds like something easy to bypass, if it's just that.

If C++29 was exclusively about quality-of-life improvements, improving what exists, I'd bet the community wouldn't mind too much.

That depends on what else comes. There are a lot of ideas, some of which will get the community excited.

my absolutely-non-expert guess is that it would work much like any other fuel? Combine with matter, get a lot of head out of it and use that in the best way we know.

There's an interesting bit about talking to LLMs to help dispel conspiracy theory ideas. I can see how that would work but also, how that could backfire as well.

Great podcast episode in any case.

I'm happy to see so many philosophy or philosophy-adjacent books on that list. And I also wonder why that is.

I ran into a similar case recently, there was a ticket describing what needed to be done in detail. I was written by a human and it was a well written spec. The problem is that it removed some access controls in the system, essentially given some users more access than they should have.

The ticket was given to an LLM, the code written. Luckily the engineer working on it noticed the discrepancy at some point and was able to call it out.

Scrutinizing specs is always needed, no matter what.